(c) Notwithstanding Subsection (b), if the claimant in a health care liability claim filed under Chapter 74 has settled with one or more persons, the court shall further reduce the amount of damages to be recovered by the claimant with respect to a cause of action by an amount equal to one of the following, as elected by the defendant: (1) the sum of the dollar amounts of all settlements; or. 0000076940 00000 n The Rules of Civil Procedure govern the proceedings in civil trials. Rev. denied) (unverified supplemental answer raised question of liability on contract thanks to "unambiguous language" in settlement agreement included in summary judgment record). 4.06, 4.10(4), eff. 136, Sec. 0 In an action in which a party seeks recovery of damages for injury to another person, damage to the property of another person, death of another person, or other harm to another person, "claimant" includes: (A) the person who was injured, was harmed, or died or whose property was damaged; and. 33.003. & Rem. Rules of Civil Procedure The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (pdf) govern civil proceedings in the United States district courts. 01-09-00696-CV, 2010 Tex. "Oh, shoot, you put it in the record, guess I need to allow it now. Transcriptions of debates and copies of proposals received by the committee are kept in the State Law Library and at the Supreme Court. ), so the courts are trying to "get modern" by breaking the law. (b) Burden of establishing exception. Since 1941, the Rules of Civil Procedure have been amended numerous times, most recently when the Supreme Court promulgated the 1999 discovery rules revisions. c. Two State Bar committees -- the Court Rules Committee and the Administration of the Rules of Evidence Committee -- conduct their own studies of the rules. That the plaintiff has not legal capacity to sue or that the defendant has not legal capacity to be sued. 4, eff. Sept. 1, 2003. Sec. APPLICABILITY. An example would be material or information described by Rule 503(d)( 1) of the Rules of Evidence. Sept. 1, 2003. 728 (H.B. The Court welcomes all input but refers it to the SCAC for initial consideration. In this sense the statute is mandatory and the cause must be transferred. 33.001. CONTRIBUTION. Attorneys are bound by the Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct and the Rules of Disciplinary Procedure . 1731a, now codified as Tex. Background. Smith v. Home Indem. In case of such denial the things so denied shall not be presumed to be true, and if essential to the case of the party alleging them, must be proved. That's basic procedure in America. 437, Sec. 0000020818 00000 n Rule 94. I.e. R. Evid. 98 0 obj <>stream )Need more? Sec. This Order incorporates the revisions and contains the final version of the rules, effective February 1, 2023. Rule 193.3(d) is a new provision that allows a party to assert a claim of privilege to material or information produced inadvertently without intending to waive the privilege. PROPORTIONATE RESPONSIBILITY. Evidence The Rules of Evidence govern the admissibility and use of evidence in most court proceedings. 491, 62 S.W.2d 113 (1933); South Texas Dev. Soon after the 1891 amendment to Article V, Section 25 of the Texas Constitution, which gave the Legislature a role in making court procedural rules, the bench and bar became dissatisfied with the Legislature's piecemeal approach to rulemaking and with the difficulty in achieving any improvement in court procedure through the legislative process. That the plaintiff is not entitled to recover in the capacity in which he sues, or that the defendant is not liable in the capacity in which he is sued. 33.011. (e) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary stated in the provisions of the Penal Code listed in Subsection (b)(2), that subsection applies only if the claimant proves the defendant acted or failed to act with specific intent to do harm. The new rules were intended to make appellate practice more user-friendly, refocus appellate procedure on the merits rather than technicalities, and reduce cost and delay. Source: Arts. DRY FIRE HYDRANTS: AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE. In other words, at a trial or summary judgment proceeding, the court should tell the defendant "Sorry, I can't hear your other evidence that would seek to contradict the deemed proveninstrument. a. denied) (determinations of summary judgment evidence admissibility same as for trial evidence admissibility); Tex. P attaches to its petition a copy of the loan. With few exceptions, all Interstates must meet specific standards, such as having controlled access, physical barriers or median strips between lanes of oncoming traffic, breakdown lanes, avoiding at-grade intersections, no traffic lights and complying with federal traffic sign specifications. It held that when trying to justify a trial court's determination of lack of jurisdiction, Rule 93 could be bent a little bit to include summary judgment evidence. In an action to which this chapter applies, a claimant may not recover damages if his percentage of responsibility is greater than 50 percent. These rules were adopted in accordance withchapter 33 of the Family Code. 136, Sec. 3. 6. September 1, 2011. Under this provision, the Supreme Court had the exclusive power to regulate the judiciary, both as to administration and procedure. 204, Sec. 0000014707 00000 n A denial of any of the matters set forth in subdivisions (a) or (g) of paragraph 13 may be made on information and belief. 1, eff. I hope the Eastland court gets a chance to find that a summary judgment record does not put matters otherwise needing verified denial of record. Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., Ch. When the SCAC meets, its meetings are held at the Bar Center in Austin and are open to the public. InvestIN.com Corp. v. Europa Int'l, Ltd., 239 S.W.3d 819, 825 (Tex. Rule 93. 28 U.S.C. (2) may not be used in any other proceeding, on the basis of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or any other legal theory, to impose liability on the person. These include: Tex. 5. In pleading to a preceding pleading, a party shall set forth affirmatively accord and satisfaction, arbitration and award, assumption of risk, contributory negligence, discharge in bankruptcy, duress, estoppel, failure of consideration, fraud, illegality, injury by fellow servant, laches, license, payment, release . (c) In an action to which this section applies, this section shall prevail over any other law. 0000002512 00000 n 33.016. Rule 106(b) and Rule 109 requests are usually done bymoving the court through amotion for substitute service. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] (Rule 109 also allows you to ask for some alternative service methods, like publication, or any other method the court authorizes if you could ask for publication.) Rule 93 (a); Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Grays, 122 Tex. 0000001819 00000 n DoM[L8j.bm3{w32->>{*By$ju/?s\u^|j8ra2\5#{>>(\ @wzC@{ISe"5fl?w!@.NF:M\LmI*-t&nBE/ p If not online, contact the district clerk, county clerk, or city clerk for help accessing local rules. Judicial Committee on Information Technology, Task Force on Judicial Emergency Preparedness, Texas Commission to Expand Civil Legal Services, Timothy Cole Exoneration Review Commission, Guardianship Abuse, Fraud and Exploitation Deterrence Program (GAFEDP), Pretrial Risk Assessment Information System for Texas, Texas Records and Information Locator (TRAIL). You can update your choices at any time in your settings. Sept. 1, 2003. Ann. All these materials are available to the public. Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 2, Sec. These rules differ widely. Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 2.11A, eff. A party may not use - at any hearing or trial - material or information withheld from discovery under a claim of privilege, including a claim sustained by the court, without timely amending or supplementing the party's response to that discovery.". Note, though, that the defenses listed here and in the Civil Answer form are not exhaustive. Sept. 1, 1995; Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. (c) Repealed by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. These Answers contain "laundry lists" of denials and defenses. Your typical debtor served with a lawsuit is poorer than the average bear, so it's off to the Internet forums: "Just got served for credit card / promissory note / whatever. A basic discussion of Rule 93Defendants frequently file generic Answers. V, 25 (amended 1891, repealed 1985). DEFINITIONS. Where the suit is on an insurance contract which insures against certain general hazards, but contains other provisions limiting such general liability, the party suing on such contract shall never be required to allege that the loss was not due to a risk or cause coming within any of the exceptions specified in the contract, nor shall the For rule-related questions, please call (512) 463-4097. While this requirement appears to be mandatory, it is settled that this subdivision prescribes the venue in such actions, that it does not relate to jurisdiction and may therefore be waived. Sec. But, as hereinabove stated, an alternative form is authorized under the decisions, and the plea can omit allegations as to the defendant's residence and embody in lieu thereof the allegations as to the location of the land and the nature of the suit as above set out. If a defendant who is jointly and severally liable pays a larger proportion of those damages than is required by his percentage of responsibility, that defendant has a right of contribution for the overpayment against each other defendant with whom he is jointly and severally liable under Section 33.013 to the extent that the other defendant has not paid the proportion of those damages required by that other defendant's percentage of responsibility. In fact, failure to verify results in negative consequences. 0000086106 00000 n Sec. 7{KJ/BxbCPi(8L? )iB! The focus is on the intent to waive the privilege, not the intent to produce the material or information. Sept. 1, 1989; Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. trailer Sec. If it's conclusive, then how can a court properly exercise discretion to allow the evidence in (as the holdings discussed above would otherwise allow)? 1. Includes checklists along with tables of rules, statutes, and cases. Pleadings are not motions; the distinction is abstruse, but fundamentally, a motion is usually brought in the context of a pleading, and is predicated on the pleading preceding it. Code 10.001-.006 (sanctions for frivolous pleadings and motions); 14.001-.014 (inmate litigation); 30.07 (personal identifying information privileged from discovery by inmate); 52.001-.005 (security for judgments pending appeal); 64.091 (service of process in suit for appointment of a receiver for mineral interests owned by nonresidents or absentees); 65.041-.045 (injunction bond not required of indigents); Tex. Most of the case law ignores a construction of that bit. 93.001. P. 93(7). 1, eff. Tex. Amended by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. There's one good case that pretty much backs me up on this, discussed later.For a judge to look at Rule 93 and say "this reads like a summary judgment rule to me, boys, whaddaya think," then shift his opinion around the Texas circuit and get them to just nod their agreement to it is pretty atrocious law making.2) The term "of record" is vague and thus can be construed to basically not prohibit defendants from mounting defenses at summary judgment proceedings to avoid losing.This is the weasel way out and about the last defensible stand a judge has on the matter. R. Civ. 11-09-00340-CV, 2011 Tex. 33.002. R. Civ. Plus free gift with purchase!. 380, Sec. Sept. 2, 1987; Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. Parties cannot contradict deemed admissions, "whether in the form of live testimony or summary judgment evidence." See Tex. 959, Sec. P. 166a(f) (competent summary judgment evidence needs to be submitted in form that'd render it admissible at trial).Because summary judgment proceedings are like trials, a court might reason, and trials are governed by "records" of evidence brought before it, if the summary judgment record puts the "truth of such matters . State of Texas | Statewide Search | Report Fraud in Texas | Texas Statutes, Site Map | Library Policies | Accessibility | Employment Opportunities, 205 West 14th Street, Austin, Texas 78701-1614. You can often find local rules on your county's or city's website. Why? Sept. 1, 2001; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. Sec. App.--El Paso 2010, no pet.) (a) If the claimant is not barred from recovery under Section 33.001, the court shall reduce the amount of damages to be recovered by the claimant with respect to a cause of action by a percentage equal to the claimant's percentage of responsibility. (b) Repealed by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. Back to Main Page / Back to List of Rules, Rule 193.6. 1, eff. Tex. & Loan, 751 S.W.2d 487 (Tex. Either form is sufficient under the rule as construed by the decisions. Amended by Acts 1987, 70th Leg., 1st C.S., ch. 204, Sec. Sept. 1, 2003. Sept. 1, 1995; Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. A defendant acts with specific intent to do harm with respect to the nature of the defendant's conduct and the result of the person's conduct when it is the person's conscious effort or desire to engage in the conduct for the purpose of doing substantial harm to others. The ten-day period (which may be shortened by the court) allowed for an amended response does not run from the production of the material or information but from the party's first awareness of the mistake. See 1 George D. Braden, et al., The Constitution of the State of Texas 471 (1977) (citing Texas Land Co. v. Williams, 48 Tex. The court's power to limit discovery based on the needs and circumstances of the case is expressly stated in Rule 192.4. (g) If an objection to the motion for leave is timely filed, the court shall grant leave to designate the person as a responsible third party unless the objecting party establishes: (1) the defendant did not plead sufficient facts concerning the alleged responsibility of the person to satisfy the pleading requirement of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure; and. That the plaintiff has not legal capacity to sue, or that the defendant has not legal capacity to be sued. That sounds likea defendant doesn't need to plead by verified denial if the pleading record shows the matter to not be in controversy! Then we'd have a pretty good split (if we don't already with case law holding at summary judgment matters were deemed admitted due to procedural non-compliance). (d) A defendant may not designate a person as a responsible third party with respect to a claimant's cause of action after the applicable limitations period on the cause of action has expired with respect to the responsible third party if the defendant has failed to comply with its obligations, if any, to timely disclose that the person may be designated as a responsible third party under the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Sept. 1, 1995. (1) "Dry fire hydrant" means a fire hydrant that is connected to a stock tank, pond, or other similar source of water from which water is pumped in case of fire. See Schafer v. Fed. App.--Corpus Christi 1976, no writ) (previous Rule 93(f) required denial of partnership be verified by affidavit, or existence could not be disputed). In Part V of these Rules of Civil Procedure: (a) "Answer" is the written response that a party who is sued must file with the court after 2. 511 and overturns Granada Corp. v.First Court of Appeals, 844 S.W.2d 223 (Tex. See Sims v. Hill, 567 S.W.2d 912, 913 (Tex. approved new Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 21d and 500.10 and amendments to Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 21, 500.2, 501.4, and 505.1 and invited public comment. 136, Sec. (e) This section shall not apply to benefits paid by or on behalf of an employer to an employee pursuant to workers' compensation insurance coverage, as defined in Section 401.011(44), Labor Code, in effect at the time of the act, event, or occurrence made the basis of claimant's suit. Only the percentage of responsibility of each defendant and contribution defendant shall be included in this determination. The party seeking to avoid discovery has the burden of proving the objection or privilege. 1989). (2) "Defendant" includes any person from whom, at the time of the submission of the case to the trier of fact, a claimant seeks recovery of damages. "P" "I dunno. Civ. Now, compare those two holdings together - when someone says something is conclusive, they usually mean there ain't no getting around it. 204, Sec. Look at the Rule again: it can be rephrased - "A pleading of Rule 93 subject matters must be verified by affidavit, unless the record is so clear about it verification isn't necessary." Sept. 2, 1987. Are these cases to be read as modifying or limitingcourts' discretion in admitting or denying summary judgment evidence when the evidence is deemed conclusive? 2, Sec. Back to Main Page / Back to List of Rules. Description: This is for a topper still has some life in it! Sec. (Magnuson v. Mullen (2002) 65 S.W.3d 815, 824.) 1, eff. An objection to written discovery does not excuse the responding party from complying with the request to the extent no objection is made. How the hell would that work in the discovery context with deemed admissions? at *5. Sept. 2, 1987; Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. Amended by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. Rule 106(a) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure requires you to deliver the citation and petition to the defendant or mail it, and Rule 107 shows what needs to have happened to prove you did so (on the "return of service" you file). The self-authenticating provision is new. TEXT. (b) This section does not allow a submission to the jury of a question regarding conduct by any person without sufficient evidence to support the submission. An objection to authenticity must be made in good faith. Therefore, if the defendant resides out of the county in which the suit is pending so as to authorize the affidavit of nonresidence, the plea of privilege can follow the exact form outlined by Rule 86, and it will be sufficient to cover subdivision 14 of the Venue Statute without any express allegation concerning the location of the land. Many of the affirmative defenses are listed in Rule 94 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. 901(a). For fifty years the Legislature did not interfere with the rulemaking power given the Court. 959, Sec. Gov't Code 22.108-.109. Part II - Rules of Practice in District and County Courts ( 15 332-351), Part III - Rules of Procedure for the Courts of Appeals ( 352 473), Part IV - Rules of Practice for the Supreme Court ( 474 518), Part V - Rules of Practice in Justice Courts ( 523 510.13), Part VI - Rules Relating to Ancillary Proceedings ( 592 734), Part VII - Rules Relating to Special Proceedings ( 735 813). Sept. 1, 1997. TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (Effective January 1, 2021) (c) the singular and plural each includes the other. Section-16 Probation and Parole OP-160901 Page: 1 Effective Date: 11/16/2021 Revision-01 dated 06/29/2022 Revision on pages 1, 2, 6, 20, 24 The offender will be advised of violations and recommended sanctions as referred to in the rules and conditions of parole. Amended by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. (c) The legislature may delegate to the Supreme Court or Court of Criminal Appeals the power to promulgate such other rules as may be prescribed by law or this Constitution, subject to such limitations and procedures as may be provided by law. (2) committing or attempting to commit suicide, and the plaintiff's conduct in committing or attempting to commit suicide was the sole cause of the damages sustained; provided, however, if the suicide or attempted suicide was caused in whole or in part by a failure on the part of any defendant to comply with an applicable legal standard, then such suicide or attempted suicide shall not be a defense. Unless such plea is filed, no evidence of usurious interest as a defense shall be received. endstream endobj 57 0 obj <> endobj 58 0 obj <> endobj 59 0 obj <>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>> endobj 60 0 obj <> endobj 61 0 obj <> endobj 62 0 obj <> endobj 63 0 obj <> endobj 64 0 obj <> endobj 65 0 obj [/ICCBased 89 0 R] endobj 66 0 obj <>stream It avoids his responsibility to otherwise submit a verified denial. The denial required by this subdivision of the rule may be made upon information and belief. A defendant can sit back and wait for the plaintiff to prove; if it can't, it loses and defendant goes home. But a party may object to a request for "all documents relevant to the lawsuit" as overly broad and not in compliance with the rule requiring specific requests for documents and refuse to comply with it entirely. (a) It is an affirmative defense to a civil action for damages for personal injury or death that the plaintiff, at the time the cause of action arose, was: (1) committing a felony, for which the plaintiff has been finally convicted, that was the sole cause of the damages sustained by the plaintiff; or. Learn more in our Cookie Policy. What do I know? The committee completed its task and reported to the Court in September 1940. Code 410.305 (judicial review of issues regarding compensability or income or death benefits); Tex. R. Civ. Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. The defendant ispleaingthat the plaintiff take nothing and/or defendant gets some bonus money for being inconvenienced etc., and the plaintiff is pleaingthat defendant pay him what he's due, and also attorneys' fees for having had to collect on his broken word. 602 (1878)). 204, Sec. Beginning in 1989, however, the Legislature has enacted several statutes prescribing procedure in civil cases and prohibiting the Court from changing them through its power under the Rules of Practice Act. Aug. 19, 2010, no pet.) 221 (H.B. Individual courts have adopted local rules mostly to provide docket control and often to prescribe standing pretrial procedures. App. This is especially so if we realize that deemed admissions are competent summary judgment evidence, and often make or break the case. 33.015. (b) This section does not apply in any action brought by an employee, or the surviving beneficiaries of an employee, under the Workers' Compensation Law of Texas, or in an action against an insurer based on a contract of insurance, a statute, or common law. Rule 166a of the rules of civil procedure requires that the motion and any supporting affidavits shall be filed and served at least twenty-one days before the time specified for hearing. LinkedIn and 3rd parties use essential and non-essential cookies to provide, secure, analyze and improve our Services, and (except on the iOS app) to show you relevant ads (including professional and job ads) on and off LinkedIn. 204, Sec. At that time, the appellate rules were substantially rewritten and reorganized. I make the following specific pleas under penalty of perjury: 4. (b) Each liable defendant is entitled to contribution from each person who is not a settling person and who is liable to the claimant for a percentage of responsibility but from whom the claimant seeks no relief at the time of submission. 0000003342 00000 n The only way around it is an "of record" exception, but if summary judgment proceedings and trial proceedings are the same, these consequences aremeaninglessif you can get around them through summary judgment! If you can't plead right, you don't get what you want, and shouldn't be allowed to cheat it by going into a summary judgment hearing with a piece of paper and saying "Oh yeah this paper says what I meant to say by swearing out my denial. 4. Right. Great analysis, and helpful to me today- doing some research for a verified denial and this was good background! 0000016556 00000 n 136, Sec. 0000045704 00000 n 136, Sec. Sept. 2, 1987; Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. P. 92 Download PDF As amended through January 27, 2023 Rule 92 - General Denial A general denial of matters pleaded by the adverse party which are not required to be denied under oath, shall be sufficient to put the same in issue. The SCAC was comprised of 21 members -- lawyers, judges, and academics from all regions of the State. Effective February 4, 1987, the Supreme Court adopted Rules of Judicial Administration providing for a Council of Regional Presiding Judges, prescribing duties for presiding judges and local administrative judges, and setting time standards for disposition of cases. 1993). A party who objects to production of documents from a remote time period should produce documents from a more recent period unless that production would be burdensome and duplicative should the objection be overruled. (B) any person who is seeking, has sought, or could seek recovery of damages for the injury, harm, or death of that person or for the damage to the property of that person. GENERAL RULES RULE 500.1. Suppose P sues D for a breached loan. June 9, 2005. (l) After adequate time for discovery, a party may move to strike the designation of a responsible third party on the ground that there is no evidence that the designated person is responsible for any portion of the claimant's alleged injury or damage. Tex. xZ}xTgM;nL dF`hv7&*JWW^?ZZj[RB>g3{fMT@=$uC 203, Sec. Select Accept to consent or Reject to decline non-essential cookies for this use. 274), Sec. Co. v. Valdez, 863 S.W.2d 458 (Tex. 4, eff. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2.04, eff. 1994, no writ). Const. "I never signed a contract for this debt and they say I did"), then the defendant needsto "verif[y] by affidavit" these defensive pleadings. You didn't file a verification!". This rule imposes no duty to supplement or amend deposition testimony. 2010. 203 (H.B. The amended provision required judicial deference to the Legislature. 0000061201 00000 n 0000021977 00000 n When a case is appealed, theRules of Appellate Procedure govern the appeals process. 204, Sec. Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. (1) a tenant fails to pay the initial rent deposit into the justice court registry within five days of the date the tenant filed a pauper's affidavit as required by Rule 749b(1), Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, and Section 24.0053; (2) the justice court has provided the written notice required by Section 24.0053(a-1); and South Texas Dev. With it have been combined provisions from a number of other specific statutes requiring sworn pleas. 15. Basically, if a defendantpleas that the court deny relief for various reasons, such as that the plaintiff lacks legal capacity to sue the defendant or defendant has legal capacity to be sued (usually because there was no contract between them entitling relief), or denies signing the instrument giving rise to the suit (i.e. 959, Sec. (No. Answer: The jurisdiction of the courts and the venue of actions therein were not extended or limited by the adoption of the rules (Rule 816). (1) each claimant; (2) each defendant; (3) each settling person; and (4) each responsible third party who has been designated under Section 33.004. This guide provides an explanation of many of the affirmative defenses listed on the Civil Answer form. It's not a pleading, it's a request within the context of pleadings. (4) "Percentage of responsibility" means that percentage, stated in whole numbers, attributed by the trier of fact to each claimant, each defendant, each settling person, or each responsible third party with respect to causing or contributing to cause in any way, whether by negligent act or omission, by any defective or unreasonably dangerous product, by other conduct or activity violative of the applicable legal standard, or by any combination of the foregoing, the personal injury, property damage, death, or other harm for which recovery of damages is sought. DESIGNATION OF RESPONSIBLE THIRD PARTY. Rev. 890), Sec. ZwqUvU[=e!l ASSUMPTION OF THE RISK AND CERTAIN OTHER AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES. a. LEXIS 6832, 2010 WL 3294247, at *4 (Tex. 1, eff. 4.10(5). This button displays the currently selected search type. The Court has kept the SCAC in existence throughout the intervening years to advise on revisions to the rules, although presently the group is not meeting and the terms of its members technically expired on December 31, 1997. Co. v. Williams, 130 Tex. 1, eff. 0000014478 00000 n 0000024684 00000 n Sept. 1, 1995; Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. %PDF-1.4 % Rule 91. Lab. (c) Continuance. 535, 538 (Tex. App. 1. <]/Prev 331476>> In addition, there have been 11 ex officio members representing various elements of the bench and bar. A party need not state that material created by or for lawyers for the litigation has been withheld as it can be assumed that such material will be withheld from virtually any request on the grounds of attorney client privilege or work product. 4.10(3). For any questions about the rules, please call (512) 463-4097. Sept. 2, 1987. So, Cantu's holding basically said that where very clear summary judgment evidence (like a sworn deposition with a contract laying out parties' responsibilities and relationships) existed, the need for either a verified affidavit to be filed, or for a verified affidavit to be correct could be excepted.Other courts began to follow, citing usually to Cantu(which we recall blew a tiny cheat to let a judge determine jurisdiction into other areas of law).