We recognise that we have a duty of care to promote approaches to responsible innovation that will initiate ongoing reflection about the potential ethical and societal implications of the research that we sponsor and to encourage our research community to do likewise. They should be completed in single-spaced Arial 11 font or similar-sized sans serif typeface. The panel will then use the information provided in the applications and the responses to the questions raised by the introducers to rank the proposals, using the assessment criteria, at a prioritisation panel meeting. complements other UK research already funded in the area, including any relationship to the EPSRC portfolio. Find out more aboutourpathway for change. The NIA is an individual award which is intended to support the principal investigator in developing research independence, and the proposal should be developed accordingly. The reviewer form asks reviewers to score their confidence as low, medium or high. Research grants are open to: . The purpose of the New Investigator Award (NIA) scheme is to address a gap which has been identified in the funding landscape and support researchers in their transition to an independent research career. Research quality (excellence) will always be pre-eminent, and no application can be funded without clearly demonstrating this aspect. The purpose of the New Investigator Award (NIA) scheme is to address a gap that has been identified in the funding landscape and support researchers in their transition to an independent research career. ParkerDerringtonLtd WorkshopHandout Case for Support as a Sales Pitch GlobalSalesPitch: "The Project is Important". This funding opportunity is also subject to our policy on repeatedly unsuccessful submissions. 1423 . You can apply for a new investigator award at any time in any field of research relevant to our remit. 3 members of the panel, introducers, will be asked to assess each of the projects. The New Investigator Award scheme will. Your comments, scores and confidence level should explicitly reflect your views on those aspects you can assess, and you are asked not to moderate these in any way to reflect those areas you feel you cannot comment on. You must apply using the Joint Electronic Submission system (Je-S) . the ideas, concepts and approaches proposed and any particularly strong or weak examples within the programme, whether the applicant has provided clear aims and objectives for the technical programme, and how they will monitor their achievements. . Where known impacts have occurred, these should have been highlighted in the application, including the assumptions and information at the point of submission. Epsrc New Investigator Award Cover Letter: Order . Index Alphabetical listing by name. Office of Research Development and Education (ORDE) in the . yBirgit van Huijgevoort and Soe Haesaert are with the Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands zOliver Schon and sadegh Soudjani are with Newcastle University, United Kingdom If you need a transcript of the video on writing strong funding applications, email the web team: web@ukri.org. Applicants must comply with the standard EPSRC terms for eligibility to hold research grants . Work in collaboration with . The new target requires the UK to bring all greenhouse gas emissions to net-zero by 2050. Stage one. . We encourage you to contact us first to discuss your proposal if you believe your research may cross research council boundaries. You can save completed details in Je-S at any time and return to continue your application later. These criteria vary according to the scheme or funding opportunity that the application has been submitted to. When you apply for funding, you fill in an application form on the Joint Electronic Submissions (Je-S) system and attach certain documentation. Flexible working includes, but is not limited to, reduction in full-time hours, long-term partial return to work, job sharing, compressed working hours, term-time only working, annualised hours. For example: applicant is on maternity leave until a certain . the application is an invited resubmission. You should indicate those aspects that you accorded higher or lower priority and why. (project number 18244), the UK EPSRC New Investigator Award CodeCPS (EP/V043676/1), and the Horizon Europe EIC project SymAware (101070802). New Investigator Awards cannot be used to provide support of any sort for a studentship. As part of the impact assessment, reviewers comment on whether a collaboration is appropriate; therefore, a good project partner letter of support shows that the collaboration is genuine, and explains why the project partner supports the project. 954 . There are 2 parallel funding routes to this funding opportunity: The full economic cost of your project can be up to 200,000 with a duration of up to 2 years. Advice on writing proposals for EPSRC funding. For help and advice on costings and writing your proposal please contact your research office in the first instance, allowing sufficient time for your organisations submission process. Projects should be self-contained and have a single research vision with clearly defined objectives and outcomes. illustrated by examples of recent activities. This is the integrated website of the seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. - Introduction-Tellthemtheoverallresearchgoal&convincethemyoucandeliverit. You can apply for a new investigator award if you: You would be classed as having received a significant research grant if a project you led received: You may still apply if you hold or have held: Holders of postdoctoral level fellowships are not eligible to hold an EPSRC grant. is based at a UK research organisation eligible for EPSRC funding. As such, the focus should be on the stated impact rather than the duration. We recommend you start your application in good time. Any investigators who do not have a Je-S account must register for one at least 7 working days before the opportunity deadline. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help us test new developments. It may involve progress along an established research direction or a tangential switch into a new or different area, or may bring together expertise and approaches from different discipline areas. Multiple periods of PDRA supervision are likely to be considered holistically in terms of the skills the candidate has had the opportunity to develop, to avoid duplicating the aims of the NIA. Although the majority of the application should lie within EPSRC remit, multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary collaborations with international partners are welcomed. We process and handle personal information according to these regulations. The clarity of presentation may help or hinder your ability to review an application, so a comment to this effect would be appropriate, but this should not become in any form a competition in stylish writing. You should typically seek 10-20% of the principal investigators time. Finally the presentation will ask how organisations such as FIG and ISPRS can play a part in these developments. Panels are organised by theme and meet at different times of the year. Posts responsible for: None. You are asked throughout to assess the application but be clear that this means the ideas, concepts and approaches contained therein, and not the specific form of the document itself. Guidance on completing ethical information on the Je-S form. University support should not necessarily involve covering part of the cost of the grant but could include: provision of dedicated laboratory space (or equivalent); provision of materials, equipment or facility access; mentoring and professional guidance. Download the New Investigator peer review form. for example, EPSRC New Investigator Awards or Fellowships. Epsrc New Investigator Award Cover Letter: Robert. Proposed collaborations for this open funding route may involve international research partners from any country, this can include researchers in 1 or more lower middle income, low income, or least developed countries on the Development Assistance Committee list, where the focus of the research is outside the official development assistance compliance criteria. EP/S036490/1). Equipment over 10,000 in value (including VAT) is not available through this funding opportunity. You should not use journal-based metrics, such as journal impact factors, as a surrogate measure of the quality of individual research articles, to assess an investigators contributions, or to make funding decisions. There are 2 parallel funding routes to this funding opportunity: The full economic cost of your project can be up to 200,000 with a duration of up to 2 years. This will populate: council: EPSRC; document type: standard proposal; scheme: standard Proposals may build directly on prior work or may involve a speculative leap forward. no. If there is significant demand, then we may group the applications by topic and run 2 or more prioritisation panels. This letter will only be seen by EPSRC and will not be sent to peer review. Your host organisation will also be able to provide advice and guidance. comment on the effectiveness of the proposed planning and management, and on whether the requested resources are appropriate and have been fully justified. EPSRC complies with the General Data Protection Regulations 2016/679 (EU) (GDPR). Those who are seeking to substantially exceed this should consider other funding opportunities. Your project should typically last one to three years and have a single research vision with clearly defined objectives and outcomes. how competitive the proposed work is and how it compares to related international activity, whether the applicants show how their research fits with activities elsewhere in the world and whether they demonstrate awareness of the context and landscape within which they operate, to what extent the research will provide the UK with a unique capability, whether the applicant has presented the academic, industrial, policy, societal or other relevant context clearly. It is preferable that collaborative partners will contribute cash to the project, although "tangible" material contributions from industrial collaborators may also be consider Read the, the spread of applications across EPSRCs remit, the novelty, relationship to the context, timeliness and relevance to identified stakeholders, the ambition, adventure, transformative aspects or potential outcomes, the suitability of the proposed methodology and the appropriateness of the approach to achieving impact. You should assign a score using the six-point scale provided. EPSRC will fund 80%of the full economic cost. The applicant should have provided appropriate methodology to deliver the research and impact programme. These will be viewed against published applicant eligibility and project . So nothing is missed, EPSRC recommends that you follow the Cost to the Proposal headings used in the application form. You should ensure you are aware of and follow any internal institutional deadlines that may be in place. We expect the level of funding to vary but be appropriate to the proposed research programme. The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) is introducing the new scheme following a recent review of First Grants. The NIA expectations documentgives some guidelines for applicants to consider during the initial formulation of their proposals with regards to the expected scope and features of their application. For example, for animal research you should comment specifically on the need to use animals, the choice of species and the number of animals it is intended to use. 2021. Designing and developing new in situ synchrotron experiments in collaboration with central facility scientists, including the drafting of . contributes to, or helps maintain, the health of other disciplines, contributes to addressing key UK societal challenges or contributes to future UK economic success and development of emerging industry(s), complements other UK research already funded in the area, including any relationship to the EPSRC portfolio, meets national needs by establishing or maintaining a unique world-leading activity. It might involve developing a commercial product or service, or creating a new technology, but it could also be about improved medical or healthcare, contributions to national planning or social policy or engaging the public in the outputs of research. Beyond the immediate use-case of CNNs for automation, there is an opportunity to leverage the internal representations learned by CNNs to perform large-scale data mining and support biological discovery. 00. This might include, for example: You should also consider the unequal impact that flexible working, alternative career routes and career breaks might have had on the track record and career development of those individuals included in the proposal. They should be read in conjunction with the reviewer principles. Co-Is and PDRAs are permitted. Standard letters declaring general support for a project are often criticised by reviewers. You should comment here on the adequacy and appropriateness of this proposed university contribution. Let us know if you have feedback or would like to help us test new developments. The content of a paper is more important than publication metrics or the identity of the journal in which it was published, especially for early-stage investigators. A proposal that demonstrates excellence can be characterised by terms such as: novel, ambitious, timely, exciting, at the international forefront, adventurous, elegant, or transformative, but it need not demonstrate all of them. This is the integrated website of the seven research councils, Research England and Innovate UK. Fewer quotes are acceptable if justification is provided in the justification of resources. The new investigator award is for people who hold an academic lectureship position at UK higher education institutions, research council institutes, UKRI-approved independent research organisations and NHS bodies, and have not previously led an academic research group or been the recipient of a significant grant. EPSRC does not assess the presence or value of any matched funding provided by the university before making a funding decision. Before starting an application, you will need to log in or create an account in Je-S. Once you have completed your application, make sure you submit document. Graduated with a PhD in Mathematics from UCL in 2014, and a Master's in Physics from the University of Hamburg, Germany. (15) The Development of Solvent-Free Reductions via . Quotes should include VAT, delivery charges and incorporate any standard academic discounts. EPSRC is committed to support the recommendations and principles set out by the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. For multidisciplinary proposals please state which aspects of the proposal you feel qualified to assess, contributes to or helps maintain the health of other disciplines, contributes to addressing key UK societal challenges, contributes to future UK economic success and development of emerging industry or industries, meets national needs by establishing or maintaining a unique world-leading activity, complements other UK research funded in the area, including any relationship to the EPSRC portfolio, plans for dissemination and knowledge exchange with potential beneficiaries of the research, appropriateness of the track record of the applicant or applicants, unique and complementary contribution and expertise of the international partner or partners, appropriateness of the plans for developing the collaborative relationship with the international partner or partners, balance of skills of the project team, including collaborators, the level of the contribution made to this award from other sources including the UK institutions and international potential partners, any equipment requested, or the viability of the arrangements described to access equipment needed for this project, and particularly on any university or third-party contribution, any resources requested for activities to either increase impact, for public engagement or to support responsible innovation. There is no page limit, but the statement should be on headed paper, and be signed and dated within six months of the proposal submission date. This opportunity will transition from Je-S to a new Funding Service after 30 March 2023. This document is based on replies to a questionnaire sent to all teaching and research staff in the School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences. Those who are seeking to substantially exceed this should consider other funding mechanisms. For equipment in the range 25,000 to 138,000, quotations obtained verbally are acceptable and should be detailed in the proposal. You will be asked to provide the following information: You are not required to have finalised all the details of your application by the time the intention to submit is made. Applicants can use the proposal cover letter to express any other information they feel is relevant to their application. The recently funded EPSRC New Investigator Award project, led by Dr. Wei Tan from Queen Mary's Mechanics of Composite Materials Group (MCM), will create an intelligent . New Investigator Awards are aimed at helping early career academics initiate their own independent research programme. The Functional Genomics Initiative Clusters funding opportunity has two stages. It is also assessed on applicant and partnerships (secondary), resources and management (secondary) and host organisation support (secondary). There is no page limit, but letters should be on headed paper, and be signed and dated within six months of the proposal submission date. is based at a UK research organisation eligible for EPSRC funding. The best experts are ready to do your dissertation from scratch and guarantee the best result. Co-investigators on NIAs must meet the general eligibility criteria for co-investigators. Our project is a collaborative one between two Universities and a national laboratory working together across a combined theoretical and experimental programme. F.D.G. Note that the existence of competing groups elsewhere should not of itself be seen as a reason for downgrading a proposal. cover letter optional attachment (mandatory for New Investigator Award), no page limit, not seen by peer review. Applicants are encouraged to have early discussions with their institutions to identify what training and development opportunities are available to meet their aspirations over the duration of the proposal. The New Investigator Award scheme is intended to support individuals who hold an academic lectureship position, and have not previously led a research group. The aim of this funding opportunity is to support early career researchers to initiate or . The changes also mean that some researchers who may have previously been ineligible to . Find out about the international development funding route. The scheme supports individuals who hold an academic lectureship position, have not previously led an academic research group or been the recipient of a significant grant (usually defined as those which included PDRA time, capital equipment or were in excess of 100,000 (FEC)). Ed Baines. Last updated on 2023/02/23 Only a Ph.D. professional can handle such a comprehensive project as a dissertation. There is no simple definition of excellence. Your host organisations statement of support is important. Complex, multi-faceted research projects with many objectives are not appropriate to the new investigator award. case for support: eight pages two on your track record and six on the scientific case, CVs: up to two A4 sides each only for named postdoctoral staff, researcher- co-investigators (research assistants who have made a substantial contribution to the proposal and will be employed on the project for a significant amount of time), and visiting researchers, letters of support from all project partners included in the Je-S form: no page limit, quotes for equipment above 25,000: no page limit, equipment business case for any items or combined assets with a value above 138,000: up to two pages, technical assessment for the use of any major facilities listed in Je-S guidance: no page limit, a statement of support from your host research organisation: no page limit.